Lewis White Beck

“Lewis White Beck's A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason on archive.org”

“Works by Lewis White Beck on Google Scholar”

“Works by Lewis White Beck's on Worldcat.org”

“Works by Lewis White Beck in Kantian Review on cambridge.org”

“{{cite web |url= https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=Lewis+White+Beck |title= Lewis White Beck |publisher= JSTOR}}”

“Lewis White Beck's "Extraterrestrial intelligent Life" online at Google Books”

“The Lewis White Beck Manuscripts of Immanuel Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy" University of Delaware Library Special Collections Archive”

“Lewis White Beck papers, A.B39, Rare Books, Special Collections, and Preservation, River Campus Libraries, University of Rochester”

“"Philosopher, Scholar Lewis White Beck Dies" – University of Rochester press release.”

“It is not my place to tell you whether there is indefeasible ignorance of ultimate reality. I am ignorant of whether there is or is not. But you should think of these things because there are no things more important, though there are no questions more difficult or less answerable. But one's whole life may be changed if one changes his mind about these questions.”

“The quest for other, and better, forms of life, society, technology, ethics, and law may not reveal that they are actually elsewhere; but it may in the long run help us to make some of them actual on earth.”

“[T]he only species on earth which prides itself on its intelligence is the only one with the intelligence necessary, and possibly sufficient, to render itself extinct tomorrow.”

“Myth, religion and now science-fiction with their tales of benevolent and malevolent extraterrestrial beings are commentaries on the human condition. I believe even responsible scientific speculation and expensive technology of space exploration in search for other life are the peculiarly modern equivalent of angeology and Utopia or of demonology and apocalypse.”

“But somewhat like people who object to spending money needed in the ghettoes on exploring the moon, I think the best hope for our survival is to be based on understanding human predicaments here on earth, not expecting a saving message from super-human beings in the sky...Thinking about and even hoping to find extraterrestrial civilizations, however, sharpen our search for and appreciation of the peculiar virtues and vices of the only form of life we know.”

“It is an amusing jew d’esprit to take a philosopher’s ten or twenty volumes and try to compress them to postcard length. My proposal for doing this to Kant’s will be disappointing, since hardly anyone nowadays will deny the sentence but many will deny that it is the seminal thought in Kant. But it was a highly disputable proposition in his day, and I think that some of the lasting importance of Kant is shown by the fact that it is no longer disputed. The sentence would be: In order to know and to act, it is necessary both to see and to think.”

“If you believe that you are not a machine, but that I am (then) I do not know why you are reading this book".”

“Whatever plausibility the machine theory has- and it has much plausibility and is a rich model for psychology and neurology- it gains by being associated with a self-exemption clause.”

“For it is only in the Critique that all the various strands of Kant's thought are woven together into the pattern of his practical philosophy. This pattern, in turn, can be understood only in the entire fabric of the critical philosophy, and that rich design can be clear only to those who have understood each of its three principal parts, which are the three Critiques and not shorter and more popular works like the Prolegomena and the Foundations.”

“In the logic of science there is a principle as important as that of parsimony: it is that of sufficient reason. The former directs us to look for simplest causes, the later cautions us not to simplify so far that the explanation is inadequate to the facts to be explained....Parsimony is not itself a simple criterion of a good methodology; we cannot simply count the factors of explanation and say that the theory containing the smallest number is the best. The ideal of parsimony cannot be expressed without the proviso that the conditions for which it is a norm shall themselves be adequate.”